EastSheenMatters reported on 1 February 2026 that the Council had written to the Department for Education asking for the decision to cancel funding for Livingstone Academy. to be reversed. This was admitted at the Education Committee Meeting on 29 January. A request was made to see the letter. Four weeks later it has been placed on the Council website. It could and should have been made available at least no later than the Committee Meeting. Instead there was obfuscation and denial, and Council officers were placed in an invidious position.
https://www.richmond.gov.uk/news/news_january_2026/axing_livingstone_academy_pressure and see text below.
Letter to Department for Education – 27 January 2026
We are writing to express our disappointment with the Ministerial proposal to cancel the development of Livingstone Academy West London as part of the governmental review of mainstream free schools. We urge you and the Minister to re-think this decision in the best interests of our children and local families.
The proposed new school is the culmination of diligent hard work between Richmond Council and the Aspirations Academies Trust over many years. It would secure a new and needed secondary school for young people in the eastern part of our borough. With its strong focus on emerging technologies and digital creativity, it would also create a specialist choice of education for our young people that is not currently available in this or any other local borough.
We understand the rationale for ending the project and, whilst we welcome the government’s commitment to increasing the number of school places available to young people with special educational needs in inclusive mainstream schools, it should not be at the expense of securing adequate places for young people without those additional needs.
It is true that pupil numbers in our primary schools are falling and this will begin to impact on our secondary schools by 2031. The fact remains, though, that we have a shortfall now. There have been unplaced children and young people in the east of the borough each year since 2019 – that is children we are unable to make any offer of a secondary school place on National Offer Day in March. If the housing developments planned for the former Stag Brewery site go ahead, we would expect further demand for school places, which would place additional pressure on our local secondary schools.
It is not an adequate remedy to suggest that young people travel to secondary schools with available capacity in our neighbouring London boroughs of Wandsworth and Hammersmith and Fulham. As you will be aware, the closure of Hammersmith Bridge, since 2019, due to significant structural concerns, has made travelling from Richmond to Hammersmith highly challenging, particularly at peak times. While some schools in the western part of Wandsworth would be a possibility, young people and their families consistently tell us that their preference is to attend schools in their own borough close to their friendship and support networks. We want to give them that choice.
If the final Ministerial decision is to proceed with the cancellation of the Livingstone Academy – and we hope you will re-consider this – the only viable solution would be to create additional capacity at Christ’s School in Richmond and at LIFT Richmond Park School. We would appreciate your department’s support in achieving that, including with capital funding to support expansion if insufficient resources are available through our Basic Need Grant allocations.
Discover more from EastSheenMatters
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
This is a bit disingenuous given that the schools in our specific area of Richmond have pretty large cohorts of students from outside the Borough – according to the Council’s own Schools Planning Plan.
So I ask why pupils would have to seek places in other Boroughs as the Council asserts.
LikeLike
There are provisions in the s106 agreement (additional conditions on the planning permission) to provide for the ‘no-school’ event but they are tortuous. There is no indication (publicly) that any thought has been given to how they might be implemented. It is one of the infuriating aspects of the council’s handling of this matter is that they have simply wasted time with a spurious appeal to the DfE. They complain that local residents have caused delays in the planning process. (That has been entirely because of their failure to take account of local well-informed opinion.)
Housing is likely to go ahead in some form; one benefit could be to improve spacing and density, which was a major bone of contention at the public inquiry. The problem with that is it would mean less profit for the developers.
A further option would be for Thomson House School to move to that area from its current unsafe site by the level crossing and sell the site in Vernon Road. The Leader of the Council has always opposed that because he voted against its presence in Sheen Lane in 2013 and has been inflexible ever since. This again will depend on financing. We know also that the film studio (where 1000 Blows has been made) would love to extend its lease on the site.
The Council now seems to be bent on a face-saving exercise. Let’s just hope that the DfE is not taken in by any of their letter which is riddled with misleading comments.
LikeLike
What do you think this means for the housing development, Richard?
LikeLike