Waitrose Yellow Box Trap

A Penalty Charge Notice issued recently to a friend was a salutory reminder of the risks of taking your car to Waitrose Car Park in East Sheen on a busy day. He had his rear wheels over a small part of the yellow line, on the best camera evidence stationery for four seconds. Count that while moving slowly forward in your car.

Highly dubious and if you’re a Latin scholar de minimis you might think. But in the TfL mind probably banged to rights because his exit was not clear when he entered the yellow box.

How many ways are there to get caught by the camera highup at the western end of Waitrose East Sheen?

  1. Exiting Waitrose Car Park to go West
  2. Exiting Waitrose Car Park to go East
  3. Entering Waitrose Car Park
  4. Driving West to East on the Upper Richmond Road

Each has its perils. And to remind you again your exit must be clear.

BUT take 1, What if you drive out to go West and a car you have been unable to see speeds from the East and blocks your exit. You’re stuck, straddled across the yellow box.

Take 2. Wanting to turn left exiting the car park, you see a space in the inside lane into which you can properly exit. But a car which was in the outside lane nips into the space, you were planning to enter. You can no longer exit. You’re stuck.

Take 3. You are driving West wanting to enter the car park. The traffic lights to your left are at red so there is plenty of time and space to cross. But out of your sight to the right comes a slow moving buggy, for which being a decent driver you stop, allowing it to pass in front of you. Disaster – you are stationery in the Yellow Box. Your exit was clear but it is no longer.

Take 4. You are driving in a slow moving stream of traffic heading east and there is no obvious reason for it to stop so you anticipate that your exit should be clear. If the traffic did not continue its stream, everything would grind to a halt. For whatever reason, bus, lorry, pedestrian, the stream stops and you are caught a foot inside the box. Stuck again.

Note if you can put together some reasonable argument it is worth making an online representation. You might get lucky and in any event payment will be suspended. But realistically expect no mercy from TfL After all they are there to make money.

And if you think you do have a genuine case appeal to the Traffic Adjudicator. They are reasonable!

Imo the YellowBox would be better placed at the junction of Sheen Lane and the Upper Richmond Road. But perhaps TfL benefits more by trapping unwary Waitrose customers!

NB And don’t miss the second yellow box at the entrance to the Waitrose goods delivery entrance.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | 2 Comments

Holiday at Home at Christ Church

On Saturday 17th January Christ Church is holding a Holiday at Home Winter Warmer 12.30pm – 4.00pm at the Christ Church Community Hall.

There will be a soup and cheese lunch, a quiz, activities, a pantomime sketch, and tea and cake. Particularly with seniors in mind, but all welcome!

For more information please contact Charlotte Hillier charlotte.hillier@hotmail.com or Mike Stewart mstewart84@aol.com

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Pensford Field More

EastSheenMatters drew attention to the current situation on the takeover of Pensford Field following the publication of a report from the Pensford Field Environmental Trust (PETS) outlining its plans to wind up the charity. https://childlawobserver10.wordpress.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=4356&action=edit

One important point raised was the refusal of Richmond Council to disclose papers relating to the decision to terminate the PETS lease and grant a lease to Dose of Nature, and in particular a private meeting between the Leader of the Council and a Trustee of a Dose of Nature, Sir Mark Rowley, the Metropolitan Police Commissioner.

The Trust had asked the Local Government Ombudsman to investigate the case, but when he was sent the pre-action protocol letter in prospective judicial review proceedings in June 2025, the case officer dropped the case on the basis that the Trust had a remedy to go to court. The fact that the Trust could not possibly have afforded to pursue a judicial review cut no ice with the Ombudsman.

The Trust applied to the Information Commissioner for an order for disclosure. A decision is awaited.

The Leader of the Council has given assurances that public access to the site will remain and that it will be a condition of the lease to a Dose of Nature. But as yet there is no indication whether such a lease has been entered into.

The Leader has accepted that the matter could have been better handled and that there should have been more consultation, at the same time stating that it would have made no difference. Now there is a way to conduct a consultation. State the outcome in advance.

A scandal is turning into a conspiracy. Unless the Information Commissioner flexes his muscles.

Dare our local MP ask a question in the House? Haha.

This is where EastSheenMatters came in. See

There is no accountability or openness.

The Metropolitan Police Commissioner Sir Mark Rowley served with the Metropolitan Police from 2011 to 2018, following a number of prestigious police roles. He was appointed Commissioner in 2022.

He was involved with the decision to terminate the role of Richmond Parks Police. Apart from being told by him, that the Met had to make budget cuts, we have no idea how that decision was reached in the face of strong local opposition.

It was recently disclosed in the Times that Seidr Ltd, a private sector intelligence company, of which Rowley was Chairman and a director, received contracts from the Met during his four year absence. These contracts were for services provided to the UK-wide body Counter Terrorism Policing, which the Met leads. Seidr’s services were obtained without a public tender by using intermediary companies.

Before becoming Commissioner in September 2022, Sir Mark disclosed his shares in Seidr and resigned as director, with his shares now in a trust run by his son. The arrangement has raised concerns about potential conflicts of interest. The Metropolitan Police stated that Rowley managed his shares according to regulations and denied any wrongdoing. No new contracts have been awarded to Seidr since he returned to the force. 

This is strangely reminiscent of the ‘false letters’ scenario during the Stag Brewery Planning Appeal, which was explored in a previous posting on 26 November 2024: see

The common factor between the Stag Brewery, Pensford Field and Seidr Ltd: a refusal to disclose documents, which were potentially important, and which might have shed light on the activities of prominent members of our community.

An aside: Seidr is an ancient word for Norse Magic.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

How are your waterworks?

Local residents will have noted that the Upper Richmond Road sprung a leak last week opposite Robert Dyas. You may have wondered which would arrive first: an icy road or Thames Water to shut the cock off.

On Saturday the barriers were erected, the leak stopped and the road reduced to one lane.

On Monday the hole was dug.

On Tuesday afternoon the hole remained and there was no sign of anyone in the hole.

On Thursday FINISHED! A day early!

So we had the usual lack of coordination between diggers and pipe menders, and probably next the road repairers. To be finished on 19 December?

Wholly different of course but the last couplet is somehow reminiscent!

‘Twas on a Monday morning
The gas man came to call
The gas tap wouldn’t turn, I wasn’t getting gas at all
He tore out all the skirting boards to try and find the main
And I had to call a carpenter to put them back again
Oh, it all makes work for the working man to do!

‘Twas on a Tuesday morning
The carpenter came round
He hammered and he chiselled and he said:
“Look what I’ve found!
Your joists are full of dry-rot
But I’ll put them all to rights.”
Then he nailed right through a cable and out went all the lights
Oh, it all makes work for the working man to do!

‘Twas on a Wednesday morning
The electrician came
He called me “Mr Sanderson”, which isn’t quite me name
He couldn’t reach the fuse box without standing on the bin
And his foot went through a window so I called a glazier in
Oh, it all makes work for the working man to do!

‘Twas on the Thursday morning
The glazier came along
With his blowtorch and his putty and his merry glazier’s song
He put another pane in
It took no time at all
But I had to get a painter in to come and paint the wall
Oh, it all makes work for the working man to do!

‘Twas on a Friday morning
The painter made a start
With undercoats and overcoats he painted every part
Every nook and every cranny
But I found when he was gone
He’d painted over the gas tap and I couldn’t turn it on!
Oh, it all makes work for the working man to do!

On Saturday and Sunday they do no work at all
So ’twas on a Monday morning that the gas man came to call!

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , | 5 Comments

Roadworks Update

Manor Road, Richmond is closed outside 66 for Cadent Gas utility works.

And to be absolutely clear the signs say ‘No through road’.

And further the estimated completion date has now been extended by a week to 23/12/2025.

Contact: Cadent Gas 0800 389 8000.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

More Special Treatments

This notice is in a shop window on the Upper Richmond Road near the north end of Richmond Park Road.

The same questions still apply.

No identified applicant, treatments or premises. It is said that it is to be a nail bar. How many is that in East Sheen?

The business seems to be proceeding with its plans, kitting out the premises as can be seen in the latest picture. Without the grant of a licence?

Undated – so by when must you give notice of a wish to oppose the application?

Or is it perhaps notice of an intention to make an application?

Watch this space.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Affordable Housing in Richmond: Green Party Resolution to Richmond Council: 2nd December

 “This council expresses deep concern that:

·  only 40 genuinely affordable homes were completed in Richmond since March 2022, with zero so far this year.

·  Affordable housing supply has dwindled year on year since 2018 – just 166 completed since 2018/19 when this administration took over, yet 491 new affordable homes were completed over the previous eight years.

  This council reiterates the need for social rent housing and commits to pursuing all options to increase their number including, but not limited to, converting Shared Ownership, Market, and London Living Rent to Social Rent on developments already given planning permission and hereafter.”

Not surprisingly the ruling party carried an amendment negating the criticism.

Richmond borough has been accused of not building enough social housing for low-income residents. 

Opposition councillors said Lib Dem-run Richmond Council needed to do more to build homes for social rent, as they claimed none of this type of housing had been completed so far this year.

A motion tabled by Green councillor Niki Crookdake claimed only 40 “genuinely affordable” homes had been built in Richmond since March 2022, which she defined as those available for social rent, with zero so far this year. 

She claimed only 166 of such homes had been completed since the Lib Dem administration took over from the Conservatives in 2018.

The motion urged the council to commit to pursuing all options to increase social housing levels on development sites, including converting tenures of homes on approved schemes to social rent.

Affordable housing options, as defined by the Greater London Authority (GLA), include homes for social rent, like council homes, those for London Living Rent, which is set at one-third of local average incomes, and homes for shared ownership, where people buy part of their homes and rent the rest.

Cllr Crookdake said she did not count homes for London Living Rent and shared ownership as “genuinely affordable” as they were out of reach for most low-income residents during a debate on Tuesday (2 December). 

The council’s housing monitoring report for 2023/24 said a net zero of the 506 homes under construction in the borough were for social rent.

Cllr Crookdake called on the authority to push for more social rent homes on existing development sites.

She said: “The council needs to face the truth. Our affordable housing delivery has been poor and this was partially avoidable. 

“Until the administration takes responsibility for its record and starts to invest more in existing sites, we will not move forward to constructive conversations about how to fix Richmond’s housing crisis.”

But Lib Dem councillor Chris Varley accused the motion of being a “disingenuous misrepresentation, citing figures without context and ignoring the reality of how housing delivery actually works”. 

He said the administration had inherited a minimal affordable housing pipeline when it took office in 2018 and had “worked tirelessly” since then to rebuild it, with the benefits now coming through.

The Lib Dem administration put forward an amended motion counting all affordable housing options as “genuinely affordable”, while stressing the council was prioritising the delivery of social housing over other tenures.

Cllr Varley said the council had completed 81 “genuinely affordable” homes since March 2022, counting all options, with 22 built so far this year and more than 500 extra affordable homes due for completion in the next five years. 

He said the authority had also brought 130 empty homes back into use and bought roughly 50 homes to be used as temporary accommodation.

“That is real progress, especially compared with the very poor fruits inherited from the previous administration,” he said.

Lib Dem councillor Jim Millard said the council did what it could to provide social housing, along with the other “genuinely affordable options”.

He added: “We all know how difficult it is to afford to live in Richmond… these homes matter for people who can’t afford market rents but may not qualify for social rent, yet the Greens are dismissing these key workers, the Greens are dismissing these younger residents, the Greens are dismissing these older people who benefit from the option of almshouses.”

But Green councillors insisted the authority needed to do more to provide social rent homes.

Councillor Crookdake said: “There are serious questions about delivery capacity. 

“Residents in temporary accommodation, in overcrowded homes, or trapped in substandard estates don’t need a rebranding exercise or redefinitions of affordable, they need homes they can live in and afford.

“Richmond has the tools, the funding, the grant programmes and now the expertise in officers, please can we use these?”

Acknowledgement to Richmond Nub News

Make your own mind up!

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Pensford Field Environmental Trust: EastSheenMatters considers the current position of the use of green land in Kew

The Richmond Council handling of its takeover of Pensford Field was explored in EastSheenMatters during the summer, most recently at

The Trust which had operated the site for 30 years has now circulated a report on the current circumstances.

“We have recently collected awards from Green Flag and London in Bloom. In both cases, we received glowing reports notwithstanding the fact that we have not been able to plan for the future this year. The main suggestion from Green Flag was that we needed to signpost the field from the main gate – they visited shortly after the end of our lease so after we had had to take our sign down! From London in Bloom, we received a gold award and scored 181 points out for 200 – the report comments on the termination of our lease: “It is a sad note that the council has not considered the benefits of the community, and the period during which the community has cared for this site. Appalling.”

We now plan to apply to strike off the Trust in January 2026 after we have closed our bank account and drawn up our final accounts. We have already made donations to the following charities (the first three received just over £2700 and Habitats and Heritage received the amount they requested of £2000):

We are also archiving our records. The British Museum is going to “sweep” our website and make it available in the future. We hope Richmond Museum will look after our electronic and physical records. It is truly heartbreaking to look back at all the efforts made before and after the millennium to raise funds for planting, for connecting utilities to the studio and for constructing the pond – not to mention the many hours spent drawing up planting plans and toiling in the field itself.

The Council has acted with total disrespect for the generations of people who have contributed their time and resources to create the field as it is today. But then, there was never any doubt that this plan would be carried through after the meetings between the Leader of the Council, Cllr Gareth Roberts and Sir Mark Rowley, the Chair of Dose of Nature and the Metropolitan Police Commissioner, back in March 2024 when the fate of the field was sealed behind closed doors. These meetings were followed by internal Council meetings in July 2024 but the papers and minutes of those meetings have still not been made public following Freedom of Information requests dating back to late 2024.

One supporter has secured a decision from the Information Commissioner’s Office requiring disclosure so we may get these documents in the New Year – unless the Council appeals! But why is the Council spending legal costs resisting disclosure? What is there to hide or protect? The Epstein Files have now been released but for some unknown reason the Council is twisting and turning at every step of the way to resist disclosure of the Pensford information. It is an astonishing waste of taxpayers’ money. There are several other Freedom of Information requests being dealt with by the Information Commissioner but the Council continues to drag its heels until, they hope, the wind blows over. Well, I think a number of us have longer memories than they bargained for and we won’t let this lie.

We do not know if the Council has yet entered into a lease with Dose of Nature – we were told in early October that signing was imminent. Dose of Nature have not yet changed their charitable objects to enable them to incur costs for conservation of the field or community activities (although they said at the Council Committee in June 2025 that a change had been submitted to the Charity Commission some time previously). We can not find anything on their website that encourages community or access by schools and nurseries.

Please do not forget to use the field as much as possible – it should remain open to the public. If you come across any elected representative, please do quiz them on why the Pensford information is being withheld and why taxpayers’ money is spent defending the indefensible. But also ask why the promises made about school and community usage have not yet been delivered. With your help, we will keep Pensford Field as a community resource.”

Whatever the merits of the decision to seek to bring about a change of use of the land in question, the handling of the matter by the Council causes real concern and should be subject to detailed scrutiny. Instead as the Trust argues above it appears that the Council continues to drag its heels until, they hope, the wind ‘blows over’.

What is recorded in the documents that they will not disclose? Sometimes one meets opposition to disclosure on the basis of ‘business sensitivity’. How can that be the case here?

Engagement in such drastic opposition in this case drives a debate that the withheld documents must contain something truly scurrilous.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Parish Carol Services

Tonight 515pm for 6pm Sheen Gate Choir at Christ Church

Next Sunday, 21 December Carol Services at St Mary’s, Christ Church and All Saints at 6.30pm.  Everyone very welcome.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Special Treatments

This notice is in a shop window on the Upper Richmond Road near the north end of Richmond Park Road. Bizarre or bazaar?

No identified applicant, treatments or premises.

Undated – so by when must you give notice of a wish to oppose the application?

Or is it perhaps notice of an intention to make an application? Watch this space maybe.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment