Housing Development in Richmond

Posted on February 18, 2025 by Richard AH White

The largest housing development in Richmond is at the Mortlake Brewery site. A decision on the planning applications is due next month.

But there are (or were) two other developments close by, which also involve housing.. There are firm reports that the Homebase site, where the Mayor gave planning permission for some 400 residential units, is not now going to proceed for cost reasons. There are also rumours that progress may have stalled at the Barnes Hospital site.

Just what strategic planning is going on?

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Transport Police Local

Posted on February 18, 2025 by Richard AH White

Sarah Olney MP for Richmond Park has written to pass on a response received from TfL after she enquired whether there were plans to make cuts to our Transport Police:

‘It is disappointing to hear that inaccurate information is being shared at a police liaison meeting.
 
Over the last year, the Metropolitan Police Service (the Met) has set out its vision for future policing of the capital, New Met for London, which sets out how it will structure policing across the capital, increase trust and confidence and drive down crime. The New Met for London plan will result in significant changes to how the Met delivers enhanced roads and transport policing services, which we currently fund. We have been actively engaging with the Met to understand the implications of this change on the policing of both roads and public transport in London.
 
We are determined to ensure that London’s transport network remains a safe environment to work and travel, and that we support the Met to play their full role in delivering on the Mayor’s Vision Zero strategy. We will continue to work closely with the Met as we respond to the changes they are proposing, and we will ensure our continued funding of policing is delivering value for money and measurably improving the safety and security of travelling in London.’

It is always good to have a public statement from TfL. Facts are better than speculation, such as is necessary with so much policy development locally. See Hammersmith Bridge and a Traffic Management Plan around the Stag Brewery.

This response refers to the New Met policy, ‘designed to increase trust and confidence and drive down crime’. That may be true in relation to local transport. It certainly does not apply to plans for policing Richmond and Bushy Parks.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

The Secret Policeman’s Ball *

Posted on February 16, 2025 by Richard AH White

It was reported here earlier in the week that a decision was expected about the future of the Parks Police on Friday. See https://childlawobserver10.wordpress.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=1854&action=edit

That did not happen. But yet again the extreme financial pressure under which the Metropolitan Police are operating has been emphasised. It is regarded as highly probable that the Parks Police will be disbanded and that this would be sorted out by the end of 2025.

A cynical view might be that that of course gives the Met, the Home Office and the Government time to acclimatise the public to what on any account would be a disastrous decision for local policing, Park employees, the maintenance of a Site of Special Scientific Interest and the public in the area and at large. Maybe they think that we will get used to the idea and the huge local opposition to the idea will simply drift away.

It will be interesting to hear how the authorities justify their decision and what proposals they have for ensuring our safety and the well-being of the Parks. No doubt it will all happen behind closed doors * , so that the authorities can try to ensure that opposition wanes rather than grows.

Continue reading →
Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Richmond upon Thames Schools: Balancing the Intake

Posted on February 14, 2025 by Richard AH White

The Government has recently announced plans in the Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill to introduce new duties for schools and local authorities to co-operate with each other regarding admissions and for schools to co-operate with local authorities regarding placement planning.

Cllr Penny Frost, Chair of the Richmond Education and Children’s Services Committee has welcomed the proposals. She told EastSheenMatters:

“If the Bill goes through and gives Local Authorities more power to work with academies to manage school places, this will be very beneficial to the overall planning of school places and management of school admissions within and across boroughs.

“Currently, academies can refuse to take individual students which can lead to erosion of inclusive practice which then affects other schools and leaves students without a school place either at the start of an academic year, or as an in-year admission when a family has moved into or across the borough. Conversely, an academy school can choose to increase its own numbers without any consultation and in a way which can challenge the viability of other nearby schools.

“For Richmond upon Thames, we strongly believe in the value of our ‘family’ of schools working together, and this proposed change of legislation will be of great benefit to our being able to even out numbers across the borough and manage individual applications. At present, we would have to apply to the Department for Education if we wished to be able to challenge an academy which has refused to take a child whose needs we think the academy should be able to manage.”

Continue reading →
Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Richmond Parks Police Decision

Posted on February 14, 2025 by Richard AH White

Rumours are swirling round East Sheen that a closed door decision has been made about the Police Unit for Richmond and Bushy Parks. And that it will be formally announced today.

Continue reading →
Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Hammersmith Bridge

Posted on February 12, 2025 by Richard AH White

The Evening Standard has reported on a recent meeting of a taskforce aimed at getting the Bridge open to motor vehicles. The meeting, shrouded in secrecy, apparently took place on 31 January 2025. The group had held its last meeting more than three years ago. It has now been reconvened by the Minister for Local Tansport.

The 138-year-old bridge has been closed to vehicular traffic since April 2019, when cracks appeared in the structure’s pedestals. Only pedestrians, and cyclists who dismount from their bikes, are currently able to use its walkways. Since the meeting there have been reports of queues of half an hour to cross the Bridge.

There was previously a proposed that the Department for Transport would pay a third of the total cost of repairs, Transport for London (TfL) paying another third with the other third paid for by Hammersmith and Fulham, which owns the bridge. Not surprisingly the authority said it would only be able to raise that amount of money via a road user charge or toll.

It is understood that any new commitments of Government funding for the project will only be made as part of the Chancellor’s comprehensive spending review, which is expected to be set out in June of this year. A DfT spokeswoman said: “We have inherited a challenging situation with Hammersmith Bridge, where decisions about its future have been ducked for many years. We recognise the frustration its continued closure is causing motorists.”

This blot on the London landscape has remained for far too long. It may be facile to comment that in many other countries around the world such an important strategic transport connection would have been repaired or replaced in a year os so. Sadly it is true. Regrettably it is typical of the silo thinking between diffferent interests which blights this country’s development. It’s all taxpayers’ money. The nettle should be grasped.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | 2 Comments

Let’s Kew up for a bit of Brightness

Posted on February 12, 2025 by Richard AH White
Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

CPZ Extensions: Richmond Park Road and East Sheen Avenue Decisions

Posted on February 12, 2025 by Richard AH White

https://cabnet.richmond.gov.uk/ieDecisionDetails.aspx?ID=500000985

Assessment by officers


The Council seeks to demonstrate, wherever possible, that there is support
within a community for an existing CPZ to be extended. In this case, for the
Council to consider progressing the implementation of a CPZ extension
following these consultations, the results need to ideally show that over 50% of
respondents are in favour.

East Sheen Avenue (Zone ES1)
The response rate of 69% is considered excellent for this consultation.
However, there is a split opinion for/ against the extension.

Richmond Park Road (Zone ES1)
The response rate of 44% is considered very good for these consultations.
However, the majority of respondents do not support the extension of the CPZ
to this part of Richmond Park Road.

Based on some of the comments made by respondents (as shown in Appendix
C), the main reasons given from those against the parking controls at either or
both locations, include having to pay for parking permits, the additional street
clutter involved, and that previous consultations undertaken showed insufficient
support in the area. In addition, some respondents queried the need for parking
controls.

Some respondents from outside the consultation area in Richmond Park Road
commented on the consultation being carried out to only a part of this road and
suggesting that the whole road be consulted instead. This was mainly because
of the effect that an extension would have on the part of this road not included
in the scheme (displacement parking), and that it would seem practical to include
the whole of the road.

Given that there is not a majority of residents in favour of extending the zone to
East Sheen Avenue and that there is insufficient support from residents of
Richmond Park Road, officers would not recommend that a zone extension be
progressed in either of these two roads at this time. Officers will review the
comments made by respondents in both roads to identify any minor adjustments
to the existing scheme. This will primarily comprise reviewing the extents of
Official double yellow lines. However, as these were implemented on road and personal
safety grounds, any reductions will have to be carefully considered to ensure
that they do not have an adverse effect on their purpose.

The provision of disabled parking bays in the area, including those in place outside the All Saints
Church, will also be reviewed to see if these can be reduced in number and/or
in duration to provide more parking for residents. Any such changes taken
forward will be subject to a separate consultation with affected properties.

Continue reading →
Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Jamming

Posted on February 11, 2025 by Richard AH White

SHEEN LIVE JAM – SECOND THURSDAY OF THE MONTH 

Calling all music lovers!  Whether you’re a seasoned musician or just love to jam, join up for an evening of fantastic entertainment and community vibes starting from 7pm. Bring your instrument, warm up your voice, or simply come along to listen, soak in the energy, and be part of the fun. 

Thursday – 13th February, 13th March, 10th April
At the Barnes Home Guard Club, 76A Richmond Park Road, London SW14 8LA

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Note the date! Tuesday 11th February

Posted on February 10, 2025 by Richard AH White
Barnes Home Guard Talk
Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment