Barnes Home Guard Talk

People and Places 76a Richmond Park Road, London SW14 8LA

11am to 1pm Refreshments available. Tuesday 11th February

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Sheen Charity Shops to Close

We hear that three local charity shops are shortly to close: Barnardo’s, Princess Alice Hospice and Shelter.

Barnardo’s has had a local presence for over 40 years. Princess Alice Hospice is closing on 7 March 2025. Shelter??

So the closure of three local shops raises questions as to why?

Is it that they are not financially viable? There are many of them – almost as many as coffee shops! But we all have our favourites and to date it seems that they have at least been breaking even. Surely that is all they need to do since their high street presence is in itself an important aspect of their work. Plus they ensure recycling of useful goods which might otherwise be overloading the dump.

Is it that the shops are being threatened with pressure from their landlords, either to vacate or to pay more rent? We should be told!

Further investigation needs to be done, but meanwhile if readers have any insights please communicate.

Posted in Uncategorized | 4 Comments

Mortlake Matters

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Some dates for your diary

Don’t forget the Barnes Home Guard Club at 76a Richmond Park Road is open for coffee Tuesday to Frday 9am to 1pm

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Mortlake Tapestry: Lambeth Palace

Moving out of area for a change while staying with a topic of local interest, this Mortlake Tapestry is new to many.

It was bought by Lambeth Palace in 2023 and is exhibited in the Garden Museum. The Tapestry shows 17th century gardening in March.

It looks like a must for visiting next month!

More on the subject at the Barnes Home Guard talk (76a Richmond Park Road, SW14) next Tuesday 11 February2025 11am to 1pm (or thereabouts).

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Barnes Home Guard Club Talk

Non-members welcome

Refreshments available

It’s a discussion – not a lecture! So come along with questions.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Heathrow Expansion

Sarah Olney wrote in her weekly newsletter about her opposition to plans for a third runway at Heathrow Airport, following the statement by the Chancellor that the Government is supporting the building of a third runway at Heathrow Airport. She notes that the economic advantages of expanding Heathrow remain contested, and the environmental and social consequences are unavoidable.

This week Sarah Olney asked an Urgent Question on airport expansion to the Minister for Aviation, Maritime and Security, highlighting that the Department for Transport’s own Updated Appraisal Report estimates that the net present value of building a third runway ranges from just £3.3 billion to minus £2.2 billion, while Heathrow itself holds over £17 billion of debt and is highly leveraged. She notes that the Minister avoided the question, but attacked the Liberal Democrats’ opposition to expansion without providing any substance.

She also asked the Chief Secretary to the Treasury how the Government could be confident that a third runway would lead to growth while a proposal from Heathrow is not even on the table yet. She cited the Head of the Office for Budget Responsibility’s recent statement that airport expansion will not lead to significant economic growth.

Continue reading →
Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Heathrow Third Runway Expansion

Emerging from the debate about the implications of whatever the development is at Mortlake Brewery, East Sheen and Mortlake find themselves plunged into further conflict which could affect living conditions for the next decade at least.

On 29 January 2025 the Chancellor confirmed the Government’s intention to promote the expansion of Heathrow Airport, including the construction of a third runway. This came with a demand for more detailed plans to be drawn up by June 2025.

The Leader of Richmond Council has reaffirmed the Council’s long-standing opposition. He stressed the significant harm the expansion would cause to local communities, already heavily affected by flight paths. Are the environmental damage, increased noise pollution, and disruption to local communities simply too high a price to pay?

There are many items on the agenda for consideration, which EastSheenMatters will seek to keep abreast of. Potential pollution comes in many forms: noise, air pollution, congestion, personal disruption.

There is pressure from Heathrow Airport businesses and some surrounding the area, who will no doubt benefit. But how will it all be financed?

The access infrastructure has also to be considered and financed. This will include the local motorways and road system, the Piccadilly line and National Rail. There is talk of pushing more trains through Mortlake; it is difficult to see how that could be accommodated, when no solutions have yet been put forward to meet the existing problems in the area.

Peter Willan, the Chair of the Richmond Heathrow Campaign, will be speaking about the proposals at the Mortlake with East Sheen Society AGM on Mon 24 March 2025 at All Saints Church. See www.mess.org.uk

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

Richmond and Bushy Parks Policing: Update

At a meeting of the full Richmond Council last night, 28 January 2025, a motion tabled by Councillor Gareth Roberts and seconded by Councillor Julia Cambridge was debated. The motion stated:

“Council views with concern the comments made by the Metropolitan Police Commissioner in which he outlined his ‘worst case scenario’ which included reductions to various specialist units and the cutting of the Royal Parks Police.   Council believes the Royal Parks Police hold specialist knowledge, experience and expertise which would be impossible to replicate by other units within the Metropolitan Police. Council calls on the Metropolitan Police Commissioner and Mayor of London to ensure sufficient funding is provided to ensure the survival of the Royal Parks Police and to mitigate impact on other services identified in the ‘Worst Case Scenario’.”

The motion was carried with one abstention.

Cllr Julia Cambridge, seconding the motion, summed up the arguments made here over the last couple of weeks.

Thank you, Councillor Roberts, for bringing this issue to council. The parks police unit could be cut imminently, impacting policing to Richmond and Bushy Parks.

Forty per cent of Richmond Park is in the boundaries of East Sheen. The community enjoy having an internationally important Nature Reserve on their doorstep. Five million visitors also enjoy the park each year, and that figure is rising.

The police unit, headed by Police Sergeant Sturgess, oversee, in both parks, incidents, accidents, collisions, lost people, damage to property, traffic offences, medical emergencies, the endangering of wildlife and much more. No private security or the diligent park rangers can enforce regulations, which are not Bylaws but Statute laws and can only be enforced by a Constable. The parks police are a small specialist unit with monumental responsibilities over hundreds of acres of Richmond Borough.

As a member of the Safer Parks Police Panel, I have seen the work they do and the order and safety that comes from that. If the unit is disbanded this will be severely compromised. The policing of 3,300 acres would fall to our local neighbourhood teams.

So, I want to challenge the few voices who are saying ‘I’d rather these police officers were on our streets cutting crime.’ If enacted, these cuts will do the exact opposite.

If police retain their jobs, and the Commissioner has said they will need to lose 2,300 officers, they can only apply where there are vacancies meaning, as they are under the Central West Borough Command Unit, they could be absorbed into areas like Charing Cross or beyond. Specialist knowledge lost forever.

We would end up seeing a lot less of our Safer Neighbourhood teams because cuts will burden already stretched local teams with increased workloads and demands to police a park without access to speed guns, off-road vehicles, or even expert knowledge of this vast area. The off-road vehicle has been vital to locate lost children and transporting paramedics and their equipment to casualties inaccessible by an ambulance. It would burden local teams with extra admin and court appearances. Will they really have time if a dog is chasing a terrified deer, or a man is forcing the antlers off a deer.

Anti-social behaviour could be set to rise, and these parks will become a haven for criminality and drug activity along with heartbreaking social issues like rough sleeping and suicide, if left unchecked.

The MET calculate they have a funding shortfall of four hundred and fifty million. The Home Office needs to act and invest in the MET.

The Commissioner and the London Mayor need to think seriously about what disbanding vital services will eventually lead to, which is a rise in crime at a cost to society and MET resources. “

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Richmond Park: the Royal Legacy, some additional questions

The version published earlier today on this topic produced some lack of editing and content, and in particular the exclusion of some matters raised.

There is an excellent and entertaining account of the legal proceedings and the legacy of John Lewis on the Richmond Council website https://www.richmond.gov.uk/media/6311/john_lewis_brief_open.pdf  This is penned by Max Lankester, whose work What’s in a Name has been noted here before https://childlawobserver10.com/2025/01/04/1566/

Lawyers might consider it surprising that in the 1750s any judicial challenge to the Royal Prerogative could have any chance of success. That shows perhaps the cunning of John Lewis, who chose to take his proceedings against the Park gatekeeper. But more recently Crown powers have been limited to some degree. The Crown is not entirely immune from legal proceedings.

The only bow towards democracy in the Royal Parks now lies in the appointment to the Board of Trustees of local authority councillors. We should perhaps ask Councillor Gareth Roberts at the Richmond Council meeting on Tuesday 28th January 2025, when he speaks to his motion on the proposed cuts to Richmond Park Policing, whether there has been any discussion between the Board and the Met.

And finally given the Royal Influence on the Park over the centuries, can we expect any intervention from King Charles III?

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment