Richmond Park: A Talk by the Park Manager Paul Richards

Organised by the Mortlake with East Sheen Society (mess.org.uk)

28 October 2024

Paul was brought up in Shrewsbury Avenue, yards from the venue for the talk at Tower House School. He went to East Sheen Primary School and Orleans Park. He took over as Park Manager shortly after the decision to close Sheen Gate. At school he became interested in horticulture and worked at Squires Garden Centre in Twickenham, RHS Wisley, Kew Gardens and Wakehurst Place. He described working at Richmond Park, a Site of Special Scientific Interest, as a privilege. He went on to talk about recent and forthcoming work being undertaken.

Many will be aware of events at Pen Ponds. The Upper Pond is a national reservoir. During a six monthly inspection in July 2024 a structural issue was found which needed emergency action. A culvert (a tunnel carrying a stream under a road) near the causeway between the Ponds had collapsed. This was built in C 19th, probably made of elm, and causing water loss.

The Upper Pond had to be emptied. It was last drained during World War 2 to prevent it being used as a navigational aid by German aircraft. Fish and fresh water mussels were transferred to the Lower Pond. There were side effects. Avocets visited. There were litter picks organised and some strange objects removed. The work should be completed by mid November in good time for Christmas walks across the causeway.

There has been replanting at Sheen Cross. There has been too much bramble, which though good for wild life needed some removal. When Paul took over the job he walked in Sheen Woods and was shocked at the level of fallen timber. Much of this has been caused by Acute Oak Decline. Research is being undertaken into causes and treatment. They were not for the time being planting more English Oaks. They might be able to source other European strains which were resistant to AOD. They have been planting larger and smaller trees. Dead trees were good for woodpeckers, owls and bats but the number had been excessive. Let sleeping logs lie was the usual principle but not always. Dens and wigwams in the Park were not a good idea because of risk of collapse and fire.

They were engaged on Wetland Enhancement Projects 2024. Formerly they allowed water to drain away but they are now holding it in the Park and keeping a high water level, while avoiding flooding. There were new drainage schemes controlling flows into Beverley Brook. It was necessary to control entry to the Thames, so that it did not flood at Barnes and Mortlake. They were working with Barnes and Wimbledon Commons.

They were managing the reed beds at the south end of Pen Ponds. Water from there was pumped up to Isabella Plantation and had to be managed. He noted that Isabella was free, whereas Kew, Wisley and Wakefield all had to be paid for. The education aspects were important, as with the azalea collection. They had most of the country’s 50 species but were still seeking a complete set. There would be changes in the Bog Garden.

Paul used to visit Adam’s Pond as a small boy and it was one of his favourite areas. Without the deer there (excluded to protect the banks) the vegetation has grown quickly and damage caused by the Alder trees growing near the concrete block at the east end of the Pond needs work.

They are desilting areas near Pembroke Lodge to create a new wildlife pond using water from its roof. The area is rich in butterflies. Work is being done on King Henry’s Mound, which is now a historic monument. It was thought that badgers could be undermining the mound. The protected area had produced a source of conflict between protection of the historic monument and protection of the badgers. They are resolving it but they need to understand the underground effects.

There has been too much ragwort . It is difficult to control. It is thought the weather had caused high germination two years ago. It is toxic to horses so have they had to eradicate it where cutting for hay. Again there was a conflict of views between eradication and maintaining. No chemicals were used in the Park except with Japanese Knotweed,

When Sheen Gate closed there were complaints that elders and the less mobile were unable to drive round the Park to see the changing views. They had introduced a minibus service three days a week. It needed better publicity.

Cycling in the Park presented several problems. There were abandoned Lime bikes. They were working with the company. If you parked a Lime bike in the Park you could be fined. Electric bikes were still dumped if they ran out of battery. They would send a van to collect.

Paul had inherited the Movement Strategy and the closure of Sheen Gate. The interaction of cars, bikes and pedestrians depended on courtesy. There were difficulties for pedestrians crossing roads. It was tricky to exit on foot out of Richmond Gate. People needed to use the right side but this was not easy from the west side of the road. They have priority on shared spaces but this was not always respected.

The speed limit on Park roads is 20 mph but this did not apply to bikes. Paul recognised how infuriating it was for car drivers to have cyclists racing past them. They had asked the Department for Culture, Media and Sport to change the byelaws to stop speeding bikes. They had asked Strava and other similar apps to remove Richmond Park from their apps, given that they encouraged competitive racing and recording personal best times. There had been no response as yet. It was said to be like a race track every weekend. They had stopped time trials which had upset a lot of cyclists but it was not what the Park was intended for. They had stopped the Duathlon. Last year when the Park was closed for it, it was used as a race track. A new company had taken over the event this year but they had presented no adequate plan.

There is a current planning application in respect of the cafe at Roehampton Gate. It has a new design with acid grassland on its roof and connected toilets.

They are working on police huts and gatehouses which are dotted around the Park to improve them for volunteer rangers.

There is a lot of new signage, intended to be informative, friendly and chatty, like the Quentin Blake cartoons, and some enforcement. The Park Map is inaccurate as the orientation is wrong – and is being redone.

Richmond Park is a charity. It receives NO funds from the London Borough of Richmond. An important benefit comes from the People’s Postcode Lottery. They receive a small amount from DCMS and some other grants but are otherwise dependent on fundraising.

A question was asked about the Parakeets and whether they had a negative impact on other birds. They did take nesting space but their impact was not considered to be excessive. Paul noted that the birds of prey like them! A question was asked about Skylarks and whether it was necessary for closure of some areas and the requirement for dogs to be on a lead when they had not been seen since August. Paul replied that the number of skylarks is dangerously low. The protected area is only 4% of the Park. They might not be nesting but they are resident 12 months a year and needed to feel safe throughout or they would not return. The safest way was to keep dogs on a lead and not have them zigzagging around vegetation. The numbers were up slightly but this needed to be watched. There were other winter visitors which needed protection as well.

100 local residents attended the event and appreciated the openness and expertise shown by Paul Richards.

See also http://www.royalparks.org.uk/visit/parks/richmond-park and http://www.frp.org.uk

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | 2 Comments

Poppy Selling at Waitrose

Remembrance Sunday is fast approaching. So you need your poppy. Look out for local sellers at Waitrose this Saturday and Sunday. Over £2,500 was raised last Saturday.

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Richmond Park

The Park Manager will be speaking about the Park at Tower House School 730pm this evening.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Stag Public Inquiry : Major Development on the proposed secondary school

The DfE wrote to Achieving for Children on 22 October 2024 about the project to build the new secondary school at the Stag Brewery site. The Council has published the letter today.

The letter below raises major questions about the conduct of the Planning Inquiry which is currently due to go ahead on 5 November 2024.

It appears that DfE funding for Livingstone Academy will be reconsidered. If the funding was withdrawn, that would require a major rethink about the use of the site. Many of the problems highlighted here in previous postings and by parties opposed to using the site for a secondary school would be substantially diminished.

Can the Public Inquiry realistically proceed with such an important question to be decided by central government hanging over the whole hearing?

Which comes first, a decision on planning or policy?

The letter refers to discussions with the Council and that is of course necessary and proper. But will the Council make any reference to the substantial and well-founded reservations voiced by the community. They have never paid any heed to the local community to date: how do we make the Minister and the DfE aware of the position? Should we be pressing our local MP, who has to date remained entirely silent on the issue, to acquaint the Minister with the full position?

Review of planned new mainstream free school projects

As you may know, the Secretary of State has announced a review of planned
mainstream free schools, to ensure that they continue to meet a need for places in the
local area and offer value for money. I am writing to provide more information on this
process.


Context

Education is at the heart of the Government’s mission to break down barriers to
opportunity and give every young person the best start in life, no matter their
background. The Government is determined to drive high and rising education
standards for children across the country. To achieve this, we need to ensure
government funding is targeted where it is most needed.

Significant money has been spent to create surplus capacity through the free schools
programme. For example, the National Audit Office set out in 2017 that of the 113,500
new places in mainstream free schools due by 2021, an estimated 57,500 amounted
to spare capacity in the new schools’ local area. Meanwhile, in the fourteen years since
the cancellation of the Building Schools for the Future programme, some of this
funding could have been put to better use improving the deteriorating condition of our
existing schools and colleges.


Review of mainstream free schools

The Secretary of State has therefore asked the Department to review mainstream free
schools planned by the last government, and that have not yet opened, to ensure that
they continue to meet a need for places in the local area and offer value for taxpayers’
money. As part of this, we will also take into account the nature of the provision that is
proposed and any impact on existing local providers.

This process will allow us to work closely and openly with you as we progress with the
review and we will engage with local authorities and trusts with more details about
what this means for individual projects shortly.

The Government’s priority is to ensure children thrive in whichever type of school they
are in – including free schools. Because capacity varies from place to place, the
Department will continue to open planned new schools where they are needed and
represent value for money. We also value the role of academy trusts within the school
system. Strong trusts use their collaboration and leadership to deliver exceptional
results for children and young people, including those in disadvantaged areas.
Academy trusts will continue to have a crucial role in our mission to break down the
barriers to opportunity.


As part of this work, we will be in contact with you very shortly to discuss the following
projects and explain more about next steps:

  • FS0524, Livingstone Academy West London
  • Our review does not include new school projects being delivered locally via the
    ‘presumption’ free school route. For clarity, where relevant, these projects will be listed
    above as not needing any further information for this process and will continue to
    progress as planned. [The presumption free school route requires the Council to be responsible for capital costs. The whole point of the current application is that the DfE was to be responsible under a pre-existing scheme.]

  • We recognise the significant planning and effort that trusts and local authorities have
    invested in their projects, and we understand that this review may raise questions and
    concerns. As we progress the review, we will aim to prioritise decision-making based
    on the urgency of delivery issues wherever possible.
  • ———————————————–
Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Stag Brewery Public Inquiry

We are just nine days away from the start of the Public Inquiry on the Stag Brewery Development. Now that the Council has, belatedly, conceded that it will livestream the proceedings ‘at a basic level’ it is important that good use is made of the facility. Updating of relevant information will be posted here.

Attendance at the hearings at York House starting at 10am each morning is also important for the ‘biggest project in Mortlake in 40 years’.

Regular reports from the hearings will be posted here. To see those you need to be a subscriber to this blog. To join the site google EastSheenMatters.

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

CPZ

Richmond Council is consulting on a CPZ proposal in Richmond Park Road. As always these proposals are regrettably divisive. The Council is keen to expand the Controlled Parking Zones and manages the process with that in mind.

Most of the consultation letter is set out below. The whole can be found at https://haveyoursay.citizenspace.com/richmondecs/richmondparkroad-24/

This presents a number of problems. The petition refers to ‘residents of Richmond Park Road’ without identifying how many. The petitioners have sprung this on the road. The Council states that it is consulting the residents of the section of the road where the zone is proposed. In reality the whole road will be affected.

“The Council would like to demonstrate that an extension to a CPZ has the support of residents so a good response is very important, although the Council will not base its decision on residents’ wishes alone.” This undoubtedly makes residents suspicious about their motivation.

There has already been uproar in the road and because the petitioners are anonymous it creates an unhealthy atmosphere. There are various ways of damaging a community. The Council seems to have found another one.

Richmond Park Road CPZ Consultation

Closes 1 Dec 2024 Opened 25 Oct 2024 Any queries please contact: onsultation@richmond.gov.uk

Overview

The Council has received a petition from residents of Richmond Park Road (between the Upper Richmond Road West and Shrewsbury Avenue) requesting the existing controlled parking zone (Zone ES1) be extended to this road. It is understood that these residents have signed this petition in view of difficulties they are experiencing in parking near to their home. 

We are now consulting all residents of the above-mentioned section of Richmond Park Road on the possibility of joining Zone ES1.

Have your say

Please give us your views by completing the online survey.

If you are unable to complete the survey online and you would like a paper copy of the questionnaire, please call 020 8871 8929 leaving your name and address and quoting reference ‘Richmond Park Road consultation’ and one will be posted out to you with a postage paid return envelope.

The Council would like to demonstrate that an extension to a CPZ has the support of residents so a good response is very important, although the Council will not base its decision on residents’ wishes alone. All feedback to this consultation will be considered by the Council along with all relevant traffic management and other highway factors, prior to a decision being made on the way forward.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment

Well done to the Hare

Well done to Lisa and her crew at the Hare and Hounds. They really brought the crowds out this morning with a competition tour round East Sheen. Four hundred tickets sold. A great community activity. Watch out for more upcoming events.

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Stag Brewery Public Inquiry: Livestreaming

Richmond Council announced last night that they have taken steps to get together a streaming provision for the hearing of the Public Inquiry on the Stag Brewery developmenr which commences at York House on 5 November 2024.

Posted in Uncategorized | 5 Comments

Richmond Park Academy

A question arose about the history of Richmond Park Academy during the discussion about the history of East Sheen at the Barnes Homeguard Association yesterday. It is the most recent in a succession of schools that have occupied the location on Park Avenue and Hertford Avenue in East Sheen. 

There has been a school at the site since 1895. East Sheen County School for Boys opened on 18 January 1927 on Hertford Avenue. A review of education in the county commencing in 1937 concluded that local population numbers were relatively stable so there were significant economies to be made by reducing the number of county schools in the borough from four to two.  In 1939, despite local opposition, the boys from Richmond County School were merged with East Sheen County School for Boys at the Sheen site and renamed Richmond and East Sheen County School for Boys and in 1957 as Shene County Grammar School for Boys.

From 1973 the former grammar school sixth form was expanded and the school became Shene College, predominantly a sixth form college but, due to the remaining grammar school pupils, not entirely so. With dwindling pupil numbers and some staff increasingly sharing roles across Richmond and Shene sites, the remaining pupils and staff  of Richmond County School for Girls merged with the remainder of the boys’ school at the Shene site in 1974.

In a further borough education reorganisation in 1977, the Shene site became the Shene Comprehensive School. The school retained its predecessor’s motto: “Enrich the Time to Come” and the school crest was a deer surmounted by a globe. The motto is now ‘Find Your Remarkable’ and the crest an acorn tree.

A major reorganisation of education and the end of selective education in the borough in the early 1970s caused the demise of the school. Shene Grammar took in its final intake of pupils in September 1972.

As a result of unsatisfactory attainment over several years, an OFSTED report in September 2007 gave Shene School Notice to Improve.  In August 2010 Richmond upon Thames Council announced that the Department for Education had approved the proposal to grant the school status as an Academy. Shene School closed and in September 2010 Richmond Park Academy opened on the same site. In 2011 the academy secured almost £10 million of government funding for building improvements. Renovation and new building work was finished in 2015,  A monitoring inspection conducted in December 2011, 15 months after the school re-opened as an Academy, noted that the school had made good progress in raising standards and that teaching was improving, with an increasing proportion that is good or outstanding. 
 

In December 2022 Richmond Park Academy was fully inspected by OfSTED and achieved a good rating in all categories.  Summer results in 2023 reinforced the school’s growing reputation where outcomes were placed in the top 10% for attainment in England.  

Save to make money for use elsewhere in the borough what sense does it make to build another secondary school a mere mile away to threaten the now excellent offer at Richmond Park Academy?

 

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | 2 Comments

Christ Church

Roger Parker noted the item on local residents In East Sheen in or about 1871 posted yesterday, which included a description of Christ Church. Built in two years from 1862 it was consecrated in 1864 as a memorial to the then late Edward Penrhyn – viz Penrhyn Crescent.

Roger writes: Christ Church is open each day and with new state of the art lighting recently installed, visitors can see not only the stained glass window mentioned in the item but also the fine chancel wall paintings and artwork on the wooden chancel ceiling, excellent examples of Victorian church art.

See also post on 24 September at https://childlawobserver10.com/2024/09/24/the-parish-of-st-marys-mortlake-with-christ-church-all-saints-east-sheen-2/

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment