A local resident has managed to extract a response on the livestreaming issue from the Leader of Richmond upon Thames Council. He wrote
“The idea that this [livestreaming] would be cost free is a fallacy. The equipment we have will be used for the broadcast of committees happening during the run of the hearing so we’d have to see if it was possible to hire in additional equipment – current estimates are twenty five thousand pounds
Also, I understand it’s not a case of the council refusing, the Inspectorate advised iwebcasting would not be necessary
That said, I have asked officers to investigate alternative costs but twenty five grand to webcast somebody else’s meeting (the council is just the host for the event) with no chance of recouping that money is a hefty price tag.
This response is disingenuous. If he had had the slightest interest in the views and feelings of this part of the borough he would have given consideration to the local issues from the start.
A hefty price tag? Let’s know what Counsel’s fee are.
Putting the blame on the Inspector is typical manipulation of the facts – what he decides is based on what he is told. Regrettably we do not know that. But you can bet he was not encouraged to direct streaming.
Now that the Leader has come under pressure, primarily as a result of postings on this blog, we have obfuscation on the costs and availaibility of facilities. If the Leader’s concern is in not having too much local interest stimulated, all his actions will be directed to that. The local authority has given no publicity to the Inquiry. Their Planning website still makes no mention of a hearing date. You might think they are unaware the development as currently planned would change the face and education of Mortlake and East Sheen.